tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20538142.post3008707117421694243..comments2023-04-07T06:58:04.580-07:00Comments on Cinecism: Top 100 Ways to Spoil A Top 100 list...(part 1)Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20538142.post-35682544800391436302008-01-05T04:43:00.000-08:002008-01-05T04:43:00.000-08:00The Third Man is brilliant in every way; it's also...The Third Man is brilliant in every way; it's also BRITISH, something the AFI missed. I do kinda want to see Citizen Kane, so i can feel more justified in complaining about it...<BR/><BR/>...The problem is, I'd want to come to it fresh without the weight of cinematic history bearing down on it. After all, it's far easier to enjoy a bit of fluff no one's ever heard of than being put under pressure by mobs of snobs who'll lynch you if you say otherwise. Knowing it's the "best film ever" will just make me spot flaws, I know...Unmutualhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06317682642911946981noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20538142.post-63824526532068583262008-01-02T18:25:00.000-08:002008-01-02T18:25:00.000-08:00Agree completement. I watched it withmy sister and...Agree completement. I watched it withmy sister and at every ad break we said we were going to turn it off and put on a dvd instead, but we kept watching. So predictable. So worthy. So boring.<BR/><BR/>I'd disagree with your appraisal of Singin' in the Rain though. I'd put it higher than it appeared on the list, for sure.<BR/><BR/>Citizen Kane. Ugh. Stop the wankery people. It's very good, but I think The Third Man is infinitely better (and more watchable).Catherinehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09258493877737555910noreply@blogger.com