I got out of the habit of posting over my AS-levels, so this pile-up of broken thoughts is an attempt to find my flow again. Pardon the mess and irrelevancyGary Oldman. Brad Pitt. Quentin Tarantino. Tony Scott. Individually, these are all names which I'd leap at and watch regardless of content. So
True Romance was one I just had to see.
And it's wonderful! Pretty colours, pretty music, and oh so wonderful. A pair of adorable, self indulgent and none-too-bright young people fall head over heels in love, and naively blunder their way past innumerable casualties. What we have here is 50% kooky, cute love story, 50% frequent course, infrequent-moderate and frequent-strong-bloody. They seem entirely unaware of the mess they're causing. Meanwhile, a whole host of memorable minor characters played by kinda-big names each turn up for a single scene before (usually) getting killed (this, along with
JFK and
A Bridge too Far is definitely a trump to remember for playing 6 Degrees with)
Special moments included seeing Chris Penn, the purple cadillac, Elvis (especially when Clarence scorns "fanatic Elvis fans" as being odd!), every time that gooey theme tune came in to remind us it was all ok, and the use of Lakme's Flower Duet (a.k.a. the British Airways music) in a scene of more than the usual nastiness:
2 comments:
I still haven't seen Hot Fuzz. Should I see SOTD first, though?
Oooh, interesting. It doesn't particularly matter (all but one of the SOTD references will work both ways...), although if I had a recommendation I'd say watch Shaun first. It's a lot more subtle than Fuzz - it never falls into laugh-out-loud parody in quite the same way. SOtD might feel like a let down after the sustained silliness of the latter. I don't know though - HF might seem loud and pointless compared to Shaun...
...I do recommend you see both though, at the soonest oppertunity...
Post a Comment